ISO Loader 0.8.x Beta + preview of DreamShell v4.0 RC 5

[CrisMod]

(19.09.2023 10:12)SWAT писал(а):  @CrisMod
Do you really think that the response from the CF card will be longer than from the SSD through the converter? Somehow I doubt it. And I don’t agree that the CF is closer in speed to the GD-ROM than the SATA SSD, because CF squeezes the maximum out of the G1 bus and responds with lightning speed. What seems impossible to me when using interface converters so it should work slower, because any converter is additional delay.
But it would be interesting to compare loading, for example UT or Sordiers of Fortune for PIO and DOA2 or D2 for DMA testing. I am sure that a good CF will beat everyone, including GD-EMU.

No, I believe that the CF could give greater compatibility because the speed is more similar to the wear of the IDE GDROM pass-through bus, instead the SATA with the SSD, being its faster nature, the adapter must make a layer of slowdown at the data speed - DOA2, D2 and so - on the SATA side this could lead to the problem of freezes in the SATA and for this reason you need a high quality chipset to translate and bypass the data to make it happen that remains as faithful as possible to the passing bus.
This is why with the most stable and faithful MOD installations possible we should ALL, try to understand how to make Dreamshell more versatile and compatible possible.
I'm here guys totally open to experiment the things with you